Voici quelques résultats.
Dans WinUAE, l'émulation via la pseudo-carte UAEGfx est beaucoup plus rapide que l'émulation d'une PicassoIV.
Voici tous les chiffres de Ragemem :
UAEGFX 1920 x 1080 x 32 :
RAGEMEM v0.37 - compiled 11/06/2010
CPU: 604e 9.516 @ 265 Mhz
Caches Sizes: L1: 32 KB - L2: none - L3: none
Cache Line: 32
---> CPU <---
MAX MIPS: 4826
---> L1 <---
READ32: 3277 MB/Sec
READ64: 5240 MB/Sec
WRITE32: 3484 MB/Sec
WRITE64: 5727 MB/Sec
---> RAM <---
READ32: 2487 MB/Sec
READ64: 3609 MB/Sec
WRITE32: 2478 MB/Sec
WRITE64: 3454 MB/Sec
WRITE: 1221 MB/Sec (Tricky)
---> VIDEO BUS <---
READ: 4765 MB/Sec
WRITE: 5547 MB/Sec
PicassoIV 1280 x 720 x 24 :
RAGEMEM v0.37 - compiled 11/06/2010
CPU: 604e 9.516 @ 266 Mhz
Caches Sizes: L1: 32 KB - L2: none - L3: none
Cache Line: 32
---> CPU <---
MAX MIPS: 4648
---> L1 <---
READ32: 3283 MB/Sec
READ64: 5491 MB/Sec
WRITE32: 3449 MB/Sec
WRITE64: 5702 MB/Sec
---> RAM <---
READ32: 2681 MB/Sec
READ64: 3945 MB/Sec
WRITE32: 2658 MB/Sec
WRITE64: 3863 MB/Sec
WRITE: 1258 MB/Sec (Tricky)
---> VIDEO BUS <---
READ: 120 MB/Sec
WRITE: 71 MB/Sec